| Posted By |
Discussion Topic:
U joint Quality
|
|
41MERCTOFIX |
09-03-2024 @ 12:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Jun 2021
|
Do any club members have insight on the preferred choice of U joints to use in an Early Ford Flat Head? Is a newly Manufactured U Joint Preferable to one restored with a Universal Joint Repair kit Part # B- 7084, if the casting of the B-7090 original U joint is not distorted from previously deteriorated bushings? Is a synchronizer ball and spring set Part # 81A-7109S originally used on a 40 to 48 Ford Transmission, preferable to the new style Synchronizer Hardware 51A-7109-S which has 3 rectangular clips and 2 semi-circle springed wire retention clips? Doe the Lincoln U joint Part # HB-7090with roller bearings have the same dimensions and spline configuration as the Ford 28 to 48 U joint? Is it of better quality? Thank you in advance
|
ford38v8 |
09-03-2024 @ 12:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 2883
Joined: Oct 2009
|
I wouldn’t bother with rebuilding a u joint. Just buy an NOS unit and you know what your getting is good to go and will last a lifetime if you lube it correctly.
Alan
|
kubes40 |
09-03-2024 @ 6:29 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 3577
Joined: Oct 2009
|
I agree with Alan. IF you can find a NOS assembly or even an early NORS, go with that. Mike Driskell rebuilds these units, and I would trust him with one of his assemblies. I have heard numerous negative reports of the Drake reproduction unit. Enough so, that I'd not consider using one.
Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
Drbrown |
09-06-2024 @ 8:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 609
Joined: Nov 2013
|
Yes to above two comments. Bought a NOS.
|