| Posted By |
Discussion Topic:
Rear main seal
-- page:
1
2
|
|
gwistrup |
01-06-2026 @ 1:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Dec 2022
|
I probably should have done a little more research before I posted my last message. Apparently post 1942 engines have a rope seal. I'm on the fence if I should take the engine out to paint the engine and engine compartment. I thought of taking the oil pan and intake off to clean the sludge from inside the engine. Do you think the metal deflector at the rear main bearing could have sludge in it making it less effective? The engine runs very well, has great oil pressure, and only uses about a quart in 1500 miles. A complete rebuild probably isn't going to help it much but maybe a thorough cleaning and exterior gasket replacement will reduce my leak.
This message was edited by gwistrup on 1-6-26 @ 1:48 PM
|
JayChicago |
01-06-2026 @ 10:54 AM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 558
Joined: Jan 2016
|
Kube Understand what you are saying. But I’m afraid to over-fill the pan by too much. I wonder how much over-fill can a flathead pan take before the crank throws start hitting / frothing the oil? Have read that over filling can cause additional leaking past the rear main. Never understand how that happens unless it was so full up to center of crankshaft. That deep, would be serious frothing problem.
|
kubes40 |
01-05-2026 @ 4:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 3580
Joined: Oct 2009
|
Jay, I'd recently pulled the pan off of my '38 Tudor, original engine, 32,000 miles, great running. There was at least 3/4" of what appeared to be oil "paste" at the bottom of the pan. In my opinion, the engine is designed to run on five quarts regardless of the gunk in the pan. Oil not only lubricates, it cools. As an example: So, if a guy only fills it up to the dipstick and has a ton of cr-- in the pan, takes three quarts to get to dipstick "correct" you think that's a good idea? That cr-- in the pan isn't doing anything but laying there. Never witnessed a manual that called out for five quarts "new" and less when "used". Mike "Kube" Kubarth
This message was edited by kubes40 on 1-5-26 @ 4:20 PM
|
carcrazy |
01-05-2026 @ 3:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1988
Joined: Oct 2009
|
If you are sure you have a Flathead that originally came with a rope seal for the rear main bearing, you can simply purchase the Rear Main Rope Seal Kit from Dennis Carpenter under Part Number 91A-6347-ST for $34.95. He currently has this item in stock. The best way to accomplish this task is to take the engine out of the car and place it upside down on an engine stand. Get back with us later if you find that your engine has the earier type of labyrinth seal in which case installing the rope seal will require much more work. In addition to purchasing the lower and upper rope seal holders which fit into the rear main bearing cap and engine block, you will have to take the crankshaft to a machine shop to have rear slinger removed.
|
gwistrup |
01-05-2026 @ 3:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Dec 2022
|
I consulted the article on how to identify your flat head V8 from the Fordbarn and I have positively identified the engine in my Tudor as a 1941-42 V8. It has the raised intake, it passes the pencil test, the exhaust ports are relatively flat, the coolant drains are angled, and there are no core plugs in the oil pan rails. The cylinder heads have "81T" cast on them. I believe this engine has a rope seal with the aluminum seal holders. Therefore, can I replace the rear main seal to stop the leak? Who makes the best seal kit? I assume engine removal would be the preferred method to fix this.
|
JayChicago |
01-03-2026 @ 10:38 AM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 558
Joined: Jan 2016
|
Re 5 quarts capacity 5 quarts when new. When I drain oil from full on the dip stick (have verified dipstick is the correct one), only 4 to 4-1/4 quarts comes out. Can only get that much back in. Engine has 52,000 miles, never been rebuilt as far as I can tell. I assume there is 3/4 quart of sludge build-up in the pan and engine.
|
gwistrup |
01-02-2026 @ 3:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Dec 2022
|
Thank you for the information. I'm sure the engine in my car is not the original. It has a Crab distributor and it does not have the drains on the lower oil pan rails of the block. I think it is a 1942 -1946ish block. Maybe this engine has a rear main seal? Aren't there more potential leak points in the bell housing area such as the oil pump and the aluminum rear main seal holders?
|
kubes40 |
01-02-2026 @ 2:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 3580
Joined: Oct 2009
|
I have to wonder where you guys still come up with four quarts. The owner's manual, the salesman's manual, any Motors manual or similar repair manual all state five (US) quarts. Heck, even the engineering release for the oil pan indicates five (US) quarts. An oil filter did NOT affect the specified amount.
Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|
carcrazy |
01-01-2026 @ 8:54 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 1988
Joined: Oct 2009
|
If you have the correct dipstick for the engine, insert the dipstick fully into the engine after you have drained all the old oil out and installed 4 quarts of fresh oil. Check the level indicated on the dipstick. If 4 quarts brings the oil level up to the halfway point or higher within the safe driving range, do not add any additional oil. If the engine has an oil filter, you can fill the engine with 5 quarts of oil which will bring the indicated level up to the halfway point of the safe driving range.
|
kubes40 |
01-01-2026 @ 4:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Senior
Posts: 3580
Joined: Oct 2009
|
Um, well pretty much everything you had advised is correct sans one thing. It's five US quarts to fill.
Mike "Kube" Kubarth
|